鍦扮悊鐮旂┒ 鈥衡�� 2011, Vol. 30 鈥衡�� Issue (1): 61-70.DOI: 10.11821/yj2011010006
灏佷腹1, Werner Breitung1, 鏈辩珣1,2
鏀剁鏃ユ湡:
2010-04-13
淇洖鏃ユ湡:
2010-08-28
鍑虹増鏃ユ湡:
2011-01-20
鍙戝竷鏃ユ湡:
2011-01-20
閫氳浣滆��:
鏈辩珣,鐢�,鏁欐巿,鍗氬+鐢熷甯�,涓昏浠庝簨鏂囧寲鍦扮悊鍜屽巻鍙插湴鐞嗙爺绌躲�侲-mail: zhuh@ scnu.edu.cn.
浣滆�呯畝浠�:
灏佷腹(1982-), 濂�, 姹熻嫃娉板窞浜�,鍗氬+鐮旂┒鐢�,涓昏浠庝簨鏂囧寲鍦扮悊鍜屽煄甯傚彂灞曠爺绌躲�� E-mail: fengdan111@qq.com
鍩洪噾璧勫姪:
鍥藉鑷劧绉戝鍩洪噾椤圭洰 (40771067);German Research Council(BR 3546/1-2)
FENG Dan1, Werner Breitung1, ZHU Hong1,2
Received:
2010-04-13
Revised:
2010-08-28
Online:
2011-01-20
Published:
2011-01-20
鎽樿锛� 浣滀负"鐮寸鍩庡競"鐨勫吀鍨嬭〃寰�,瑗挎柟瀛﹁�呭闂ㄧ绀惧尯鎸佽礋闈㈡�佸害,鐒惰�岄棬绂佺ぞ鍖哄湪涓嶅悓鍖哄煙鐨勫嚭鐜板彈鍒朵簬褰撳湴鐨勭ぞ浼氭枃鍖栬绱�,骞跺彲鑳藉褰撳湴浜х敓涓嶅悓鐨勫奖鍝嶃�傛湰鏂囪瘯鍥炬帰璁ㄥ湪涓浗鐗规畩鐨勭ぞ浼氭枃鍖栬儗鏅笅,闂ㄧ绀惧尯涓庡懆杈圭ぞ浼氱粡娴庡湴浣嶈緝浣庨偦閲岀殑鑱旂郴鍜岀ぞ浼氬叧绯�,骞堕�氳繃鍒嗘瀽闂ㄧ绀惧尯灞呮皯鐨勬椿鍔ㄨ寖鍥村拰鍥村鍐呭灞呮皯褰兼闂寸殑鎬佸害鍜岀ぞ浼氫氦寰�鏉ユ帰璁ㄩ棬绂佺ぞ鍖虹殑褰卞搷銆備互骞垮窞鐣鍗楁郸宀涗附姹熻姳鍥负妗堜緥鍦�,缁撳悎闂嵎璋冩煡銆佹繁搴﹁璋堝拰鍙備笌寮忚瀵熺瓑鐮旂┒鏂规硶,鐮旂┒鍙戠幇:涓庡崡闈炪�侀樋鏍瑰环绛夊浗瀹朵笉鍚岀殑鏄�,鎴戝浗闂ㄧ绀惧尯涓庡懆杈归偦閲屽瓨鍦ㄥ姛鑳芥�т簰鍔�,骞舵湭缁欏懆杈归偦閲岄�犳垚琚殧绂诲拰琚瑙嗙殑蹇冪悊,鍦扮悊绌洪棿涓婄殑涓磋繎鎬у弽鑰屼负涓嶅悓闃跺眰鍜屼笉鍚岀敓娲昏儗鏅殑灞呮皯涔嬮棿鐨勭浉浜掍簡瑙c�佽瀺鍚堝拰娌熼�氭彁渚涗簡鏈轰細鍜屽彲鑳姐��
灏佷腹, Werner Breitung, 鏈辩珣. 浣忓畢閮婂尯鍖栬儗鏅笅闂ㄧ绀惧尯涓庡懆杈归偦閲屽叧绯�——浠ュ箍宸炰附姹熻姳鍥负渚媅J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2011, 30(1): 61-70.
FENG Dan, Werner Breitung, ZHU Hong. Space of fragmentation: A study of the linkages between gated communities and their neighborhoods in Guangzhou, China[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 30(1): 61-70.
[1] Warren S.Popular cultural practices in the "Postmodern city".Urban Geography,1996,17(6):545~567.[2] Hanson S.Ten Geographic Ideas That Changed the World.Piscataway:Rutgers University Press,1997.[3] Sorkin M.Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space.New York:Hill and Wang,1992.[4] Dear M,Flusty S .Postmodern urbanism.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1998,88(1):50~72.[5] Soja E W.Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishers,2000.[6] Blakely E,Snyder M G .Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States.Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press,1997.[7] Low S.The edge and the centre: Gated communities and the discourse of urban fear.American Anthropologist,2001,103(1):45~58.[8] Le Goix R.Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in southern California.Housing Studies,2005,20(2):323~343.[9] Webster C.Gated communities of tomorrow.Town Planning Review,2001,72:149~169.[10] Webster C.Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts, and gemeinschaft.Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design,2002,29(3):397~412.[11] McKenzie E.Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government.London:Yale University Press,1994.[12] Atkinson R,Blandy S.Introduction: International perspectives on the new enclavism and the rise of gated communities.Housing Studies,2005,20(2):177~186.[13] Alvarez-vadulla M J.Golden ghettos: Gated communities and class residential segregation in Montevideo, Uruguay.Environment and Planning A,2007,39(1):47~63.[14] Atkinson R,Flint J.Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-pace trajectories of segregation.Housing Studies,2004,19(6):875~892.[15] Caldeira T.Fortified enclaves: The new urban segregation.Public Culture,1996,8(2):303~328.[16] Massey D,Denton N.American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass.Boston:Harvard University Press,1998.[17] Borsdorf A,Hidalgo R.New dimensions of social exclusion in Latin America: From gated communities to gated cities, the case of Santiago de Chile.Land Use Policy,2008,25(2):153~160.[18] Caldeira T.City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press,2000.[19] Low S.Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York:Routledge,2003.[20] Davis M.City of quartz: Excavating the Future of Los Angeles. New York:Verso,1990.[21] Lemanski C.Spaces of exclusivity or connection? Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbor in a cape town master plan development.Urban Studies,2006,43(2):397~420.[22] Roitman S.Who segregates whom? The analysis of a gated community in Mendoza, Argentina.Housing Studies,2005,20(2):303~321.[23] 鏉庡織鍒�,鍚寸細榫�.杞瀷鏈熶笂娴风ぞ浼氱┖闂村垎寮傜爺绌�.鍦扮悊瀛︽姤,2006,61(2):199~211.[24] 榄忕珛鍗�,闂皬鍩�.澶у煄甯傞儕鍖哄寲涓ぞ浼氱┖闂寸殑"闈炲潎琛$牬纰庡寲"——浠ュ箍宸炲競涓轰緥.鍩庡競瑙勫垝,2006,30(5):55~62.[25] 椹竻瑁�,寮犳枃灏�.鍖椾含甯傚眳浣忛儕鍖哄寲绌洪棿鍒嗗竷鐗瑰緛鍙婂奖鍝嶅洜绱�.鍦扮悊鐮旂┒,2006,25(1):121~132.[26] Wu F L,Webber K.The rise of "Foreign gated communities" in Beijing: Between economic globalization and local institutions.Cities,2004,21(3):203~213.[27] Wu F L.Rediscovering the 'gate' under market transition: From work-nit compounds to commodity housing enclaves.Housing Studies,2005,20(2):235~254 .[28] Glaze Webster G,C,Frantz K.Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives.New York:Routledge,2006.[29] Pow C P,Kong L.Marketing the Chinese dream home: Gated communities and representations of the good life in (post-socialist shanghai.Urban Geography,2007,28(2):129~159.[30] 缂湸.鍩庡競鐢熸椿鐨勭檶鐥�——灏侀棴寮忓皬鍖虹殑闂鍜屽绛�.鏃朵唬寤虹瓚,2004,(5):46~50.[31] Miao P U.Deserted streets in a jammed town: The gated community in Chinese cities and its solution.Journal of Urban Design,2003,8(1):45~66.[32] Huang Y.Collectivism, political control, and gating in Chinese cities.Urban Geography,2006,27(6):507~525.[33] 鏉ㄦ槬鐕�,闂典功.闂ㄧ绀惧尯鐮旂┒鐨勭悊璁烘鏋朵笌涓浗妯″瀷.鍗庝腑寤虹瓚,2008,26(11):139~143.[34] 淇炲瓟鍧�.鐞嗘兂鏅鎺㈡簮:椋庢按鐨勬枃鍖栨剰涔�.鍖椾含:鍟嗗姟鍗颁功棣�,2004. |
[1] | 钄℃檽姊�, 閭瑰皬涓�, 寮犱腹瀹�, 鍚存吵鐞�. 婕╂丁寮忔祦鍔細鏂板瀷鍩庝埂涓ゆ爾缇や綋鐨勬棩甯哥敓娲诲疄璺佃繃绋嬩笌鏈哄埗[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2024, 43(1): 17-30. |
[2] | 瀛欐, 涔斿織寮�, 鏉庡崕鑱�. 椋庡悜闅忛珮搴︾殑鍋忚浆鍙婂叾瀵规寚鏁板粨绾跨殑褰卞搷——浠ュ箍宸炰富鍩庡尯涓轰緥[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2022, 41(8): 2295-2310. |
[3] | 鏂囪悕, 鍛ㄧ礌绾�. 瀹跺涵鍖栬縼绉诲娴佸姩浜哄彛鑱屼綇鍏崇郴鐨勫奖鍝�——浠ュ箍宸炰负渚�[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2022, 41(4): 1212-1226. |
[4] | 鐢虫偊, 缃楅洩鐟�. 鍩轰簬涓綋鏃剁┖閭昏繎鎸囨暟鐨勬埛绫嶇淮搴︾ぞ浼氱┖闂村垎寮傜爺绌�——浠ヤ笂娴峰競閮婂尯10涓吀鍨嬮晣涓轰緥[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2022, 41(4): 1152-1169. |
[5] | 鐜嬫磱, 宀虫檽涓�, 寮犺櫣楦�. 骞垮窞閮藉競鍖虹鎴挎埛鐨勭┖闂村垎寮備笌灞呬綇閫夋嫨鍊惧悜[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2022, 41(2): 480-493. |
[6] | 鑾儬鏂�, 缃楃弬, 鐜嬪皯鍓�, 鍛ㄦ槬灞�. 骞垮窞甯備腑蹇冨煄鍖洪楗簵绌洪棿鍒嗗紓涓庢満鍒跺樊寮傜爺绌垛�斺�斿熀浜庝紶缁熷簵涓庡鍗栧簵鐨勫姣�[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2022, 41(12): 3318-3334. |
[7] | 娌堥潤, 鐜嬪皯璋�, 鍛ㄦ骞�. 鐜鍏瑙嗚涓嬪箍宸炲競姹℃煋浼佷笟鍒嗗竷涓庡尯鍩熶汉鍙gぞ浼氱壒寰佺殑鏃剁┖鍏崇郴鐮旂┒[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2022, 41(1): 46-62. |
[8] | 鍚磋搲, 娼樺崜鏋�, 鍒樻檾, 鏉庡織鍒�. 鍩庡競琛楁櫙缁垮湴瀵瑰眳姘戝績鐞嗗仴搴风殑褰卞搷——浠ュ箍宸炰负渚�[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2021, 40(8): 2272-2291. |
[9] | 鐜嬫尝, 鐢勫嘲, 寮犲鐞�, 榛勫閿�, 鍛ㄤ寒. 绌烘皵姹℃煋瀵瑰煄甯傛椿鍔涚殑褰卞搷鍙婂叾寤烘垚鐜寮傝川鎬�——鍩轰簬澶ф暟鎹殑鍒嗘瀽[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2021, 40(7): 1935-1948. |
[10] | 椹噷, 闄堟旦鐒�, 鏈辩珣. 鍚庡煄甯傛櫙瑙備腑鐨勪埂鎰佷笌鍦版柟鎵瑰垽锛氬熀浜庘�滅彔姹熷娓糕�濊壓鏈睍鐨勫浘鍍忓垎鏋�[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2021, 40(6): 1637-1651. |
[11] | 鍛ㄦ槬灞�, 寰愭湡鑾�, 鏇规案鏃�. 鍩轰簬鐞嗘�ч�夋嫨鐞嗚鐨勫箍宸炰笉鍚岀被鍨嬬ぞ鍖鸿�佸勾浜虹嫭绔嬪眳浣忕壒寰佸強褰卞搷鍥犵礌[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2021, 40(5): 1495-1514. |
[12] | 鍒樻槦鍗�, 鍚村織宄�, 楠嗕粊娉�, 鍚磋壋鑹�. 鍩轰簬澶氭簮鏁版嵁鍜屾繁搴﹀涔犵殑鍩庡競杈圭紭鍖哄垽瀹�[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2020, 39(2): 243-256. |
[13] | 椹噷,寮犲獩濯�,鏈辩珣,闄堟檽浜�. 鍩庡競琛屾斂鍖哄垝璋冩暣鑳屾櫙涓嬪煄閮婂眳姘戝湴鏂硅鍚岀殑閲嶆瀯涓庢満鍒剁爺绌垛�斺�斾互骞垮窞鐣灏忛緳鏉戜负渚�[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2019, 38(8): 2044-2057. |
[14] | 楂樻灚, 鏉庡皯鑻�, 鍚村織宄�, 鍚曞笣姹�, 榛勫啝骞�, 鍒樺皬骞�. 骞垮窞甯備富鍩庡尯鍏变韩鍗曡溅楠戣鐩殑鍦版椂绌虹壒寰佷笌褰卞搷鍥犵礌[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2019, 38(12): 2859-2872. |
[15] | 缃楃鑿�, 涓佺粛鑾�, 娼樼弬. 澶栨潵楗鏂囧寲褰卞搷涓嬪箍宸炴湰鍦板眳姘戝湴鏂硅韩浠藉缓鏋勮繃绋嬬殑浠i檯宸紓[J]. 鍦扮悊鐮旂┒, 2018, 37(9): 1762-1774. |
闃呰娆℃暟 | ||||||
鍏ㄦ枃 |
|
|||||
鎽樿 |
|
|||||