鍦扮悊鐮旂┒ 鈥衡�� 2013, Vol. 32 鈥衡�� Issue (1): 133-145.DOI: 10.11821/yj2013010014

鈥� 鍩庡競涓庢梾娓稿湴鐞� 鈥� 涓婁竴绡�    涓嬩竴绡�

鍩庡競缁煎悎鎵胯浇鍔涚殑鐮旂┒杩涘睍鍙婂睍鏈�

鐭冲繂閭�, 灏规槍搴�, 鐜嬭春灏�, 璋枃鍨�   

  1. 鍚屾祹澶у娴嬬粯涓庡湴鐞嗕俊鎭闄�, 涓婃捣200092
  • 鏀剁鏃ユ湡:2012-02-17 淇洖鏃ユ湡:2012-09-30 鍑虹増鏃ユ湡:2013-01-10 鍙戝竷鏃ユ湡:2013-01-10
  • 浣滆�呯畝浠�:鐭冲繂閭�(1963- ),鐢�,婀栧崡鏂伴偟浜�,鍗氬+,鏁欐巿,鍗氬+鐢熷甯堛�備富瑕佷粠浜嬪煄甯備笌鍖哄煙鍙戝睍鐮旂┒銆侲-mail:shiyishao@tongji.edu.cn
  • 鍩洪噾璧勫姪:

    涓婃捣甯傚湴璐ㄨ皟鏌ョ爺绌堕櫌椤圭洰(2011(D)-0301F1-02)

Research progress and prospect on urban comprehensive carrying capacity

SHI Yishao, YIN Changying, WANG Hefeng, TAN Wenken   

  1. College of Surveying and Geo-informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2012-02-17 Revised:2012-09-30 Online:2013-01-10 Published:2013-01-10

鎽樿锛� 鎵胯浇鍔涚爺绌惰寖鐣寸粡鍘嗕簡闈炰汉绫荤敓鐗╃缇ゆ壙杞藉姏銆佷汉鍙f壙杞藉姏銆佽祫婧愭壙杞藉姏銆佺幆澧冩壙杞藉姏銆佺敓鎬佹壙杞藉姏銆佺粡娴庢壙杞藉姏銆佹枃鍖栨壙杞藉姏銆佺ぞ浼氭壙杞藉姏绛夋蹇靛唴娑电殑婕旇繘杩囩▼,鍛堢幇鍑轰粠鐢熺墿绉嶇兢鎵胯浇鍔涙墿灞曞埌“鑰曞湴—椋熺墿—浜哄彛”鎵胯浇鍔涖�佷粠鍗曡绱犲埗绾︽壙杞藉姏鍙戝睍鍒板瑕佺礌鍒剁害鐨勭郴缁熸壙杞藉姏銆佷粠鍗曠函鍩轰簬鑷劧璧勬簮绂�璧嬬殑鎵胯浇鍔涚爺绌跺欢浼稿埌娑电洊鑷劧璧勬簮绂�璧嬪拰浜虹被鍙戝睍闇�姹傜殑缁煎悎鎵胯浇鍔涖�佷粠鍗曚釜鍩庡競鎵胯浇鍔涙墿灞曞埌鍖哄煙鍩庡競缇ょ患鍚堟壙杞藉姏鐮旂┒绛夋紨鍙樼壒寰併�備絾鍙︿竴鏂归潰,涔熶笉鏃跺彂鍑�“寤鸿搴熷純鎵胯浇鍔涚爺绌�”鐨勫弽瀵逛箣澹般�傛湰鏂囨寚鍑�:鍩庡競缁煎悎鎵胯浇鍔涗笉鏄竴涓吉鍛介,鍦ㄤ竴瀹氭椂绌烘潯浠跺強璧勬簮绂�璧嬪拰鐜瀹归噺绾︽潫涓�,鍩庡競鎵胯浇鍔涢槇鍊兼槸瀹㈣瀛樺湪鐨勩�傚苟灏卞煄甯傜患鍚堟壙杞藉姏鐨勮瘎浠风悊蹇点�侀檺鍒舵�у洜绱犵殑杈ㄨ瘑銆佽瘎浠锋柟娉曘�佺┖闂村垎绫诲垎绾ц瘎浠风瓑瀛︽湳闂灞曞紑璁ㄨ;鎻愬嚭骞惰繍鐢�"鐘舵�佹寚鏁�"娉曟潵杈ㄨ瘑鍩庡競缁煎悎鎵胯浇鍔涚殑涓昏闄愬埗鎬у洜绱犮�傛渶鍚�,瀵规湭鏉ョ殑杩涗竴姝ユ繁鍖栫爺绌惰繘琛屼簡灞曟湜,鏃ㄥ湪涓虹浉鍏崇爺绌舵彁渚涘惎杩拰鍙傝�冦��

鍏抽敭璇�: 鍩庡競缁煎悎鎵胯浇鍔�, 璇勪环鐞嗗康, 璇勪环瑕佺礌, 璇勪环鏂规硶, 鐘舵�佹寚鏁�, 绌洪棿鍒嗙被璇勪环涓庡垎绾ц瘎浠�

Abstract: The research on carrying capacity has involved in an evolution process which includes many concepts such as non-human biological population carrying capacity, population carrying capacity, resources carrying capacity, environmental carrying capacity, ecological carrying capacity, cultural carrying capacity and social carrying capacity. Four typical characteristics are emerging in the process, one is that the appraisal of carrying capacity was extended from biological population to "cultivated land-food-population" , the second is that the evaluation of carrying capacity restricted by single factor has changed to multiple factors, the third is that the appraisal of carrying capacity merely based on natural resources endowment has extended to depend on integrating natural resources endowment and human development requirements, and the fourth is that the estimation of carrying capacity was enlarged from single city to conurbation. This paper claimed that the urban comprehensive carrying capacity is not a meaningless question; its threshold limit value existed indeed in a particular temporal-spatial situation and under definite resources and environment constraints. Additionally, some issues such as the philosophy of evaluation for urban comprehensive carrying capacity, identification of the limiting factors, spatial classification appraisal and grading appraisal and evaluation methods were discussed. Also, the further study of urban carrying capacity is prospected.

Key words: urban comprehensive carrying capacity, philosophy of evaluation, appraisal factors, estimation methods, index of status, spatial classification appraisal and grading appraisal